Compliance with the bundle is not enough: critical analysis of pediatric sepsis in a hospital ina middle-income country
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61708/enr0bd05Keywords:
Sepsis, Pediatrics, Emergency Medical Services, Guideline AdherenceAbstract
Pediatric sepsis is one of the leading causes of infant mortality worldwide. Early implementation of evidence-based management packages has been shown to improve survival; however, their application faces challenges, particularly in middle-income countries. This study evaluated whether adherence to the sepsis protocol within the f irst hour is associated with better clinical outcomes in a tertiary public hospital in Ecuador. Methods: Observational, retrospective, and analytical study conducted between 2022 and 2025 in children under f ive years of age with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock. Compliance with the sepsis protocol (blood cultures before antibiotics, antibiotics ≤1 h, and initiation of adequate fluid therapy) and its association with mortality, ICU admission, and length of hospitalization were evaluated using bivariate analysis and logistic regression (crude and adjusted). Results: Ninety-six patients with a median age of two years (IQR: 1–3) were included. Overall mortality was 7.3%, and 32% of cases required admission to the ICU. Thirty-seven-point five percent were classified as adhering to the package (3 components) within the first hour. Compliance with the package was not associated with mortality (OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.27–6.04; p = 0.762), ICU admission (p = 0.857), or length of hospital stay (p = 0.241). After adjusting for age, sex, pulmonary focus, and use of vasopressors, the association remained nonsignificant (adjusted OR = 1.17; 95% CI: 0.21–6.40; p = 0.860). The use of vasoactive drugs was significantly associated with mortality (p = 0.0003). Conclusions: Compliance with the sepsis package was not associated with better clinical outcomes in this cohort. These findings should be interpreted considering the structural limitations of the local context, such as delays in recognition, difficulties in real-time recording, and partial implementation of protocols. In addition, the small sample size limits statistical power, so clinically relevant associations may not have reached significance. Contextualized, multicenter interventions are needed to strengthen pediatric sepsis care in vulnerable settings.
Downloads
References
1. Weiss SL, Fitzgerald JC. Pediatric sepsis diagnosis, management, and sub-phenotypes. Pediatrics. 2024;153(1):e2023062967. doi:10.1542/peds.2023-062967 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2023-062967 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2023-062967
2. Suru M, Duma N, Sorin A, et al. Delayed administration of antibiotics beyond the first hour of recognition is associated with increased mortality rates in children with sepsis/severe sepsis and septic shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021;22(1):e5-e14. doi:10.1097/PCC.0000000000002550 https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000002550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000002550
3. Lane RD, Goodman DM, Miksa M, et al. Pediatric septic shock collaborative improves emergency department sepsis care in children. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2022;7(2):e562. doi:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000562 https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000562
4. Aneja RK, Carcillo JA. Medication and fluid management of pediatric sepsis and septic shock. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2022;34(2):193-201. doi:10.1097/MOP.0000000000001111 https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000001111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000001111
5. Carcillo JA, Halstead ES, Hall MW, et al. Sepsis and septic shock: evolving evidence, evolving paradigms. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2022;69(2):343-361. doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2021.12.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2021.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2021.12.001
6. Han YY, Doughty C, Bansal S, et al. Current sepsis therapeutics. Crit Care Clin. 2023;39(1):67-84. doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2022.09.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2022.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2022.09.003
7. Buonsenso D, Gatti S, De Rose C, et al. Paediatric and neonatal sepsis and inflammation. Pediatr Res. 2022;91(2):267-269. doi:10.1038/s41390-021-01918-4 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-021-01918-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-021-01918-4
8. Menéndez C, García-Basteiro AL, Aguilera-Alonso D, et al. Current concepts in sepsis management in children. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57(10):e01851-19. doi:10.1128/JCM.01851-19 https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01851-19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01851-19
9. Lane RD, Ortega P, Hammer HL, et al. Equity in pediatric sepsis outcomes: a call to action. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(1):e240480. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0480
10. Santos RG, López-Astudillo D, Gómez J, et al. Pediatric sepsis mortality and risk prediction in low-resource settings. BMC Infect Dis. 2023;23(1):717. doi:10.1186/s12879-023-08365-0
11. Fernandez-Sarmiento J, Rodríguez-Vega G, Ramírez J, et al. Outcomes in Latin American children with sepsis in intensive care. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024;29:100421. doi:10.1016/j.lana.2024.100421
12. Sahoo J, Parida S, Padhi S, et al. Compliance to sepsis bundle and its impact on mortality in children: experience from a low-resource setting. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(2):110-116. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23391 https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23391
13. Linder K, Fourie C, Blaauw D, et al. Sepsis bundle compliance and outcome in paediatric patients: a prospective observational study in South Africa. Afr J Emerg Med. 2022;12(1):25-30. doi:10.1016/j.afjem.2021.10.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2021.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2021.10.003
14. López-Astudillo D, Rodríguez C, Gómez J, et al. Early implementation of sepsis bundle improves outcomes in Colombian pediatric hospitals. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021;40(5):e197-e202. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000003060 https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000003060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000003060
15. Rivas-Lillo R, García D, Gonzales J, et al. Pediatric sepsis epidemiology and outcomes in a tertiary center in Lima, Peru. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2021;38(1):42-48. doi:10.17843/rpmesp.2021.381.5402
16. Rodríguez-Vega G, Jiménez M, Martínez A, et al. Distribution of infectious foci and mortality in pediatric sepsis: a multicenter study in Mexico. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 2019;76(5):245-252. doi:10.24875/BMHIM.19000108 https://doi.org/10.24875/BMHIM.19000108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24875/BMHIM.19000108
17. Carillo R, Morales L, Mazon H, Zambrano L, Garcés U. Perfil clínico-epidemiológico de sepsis temprana en recién nacidos: estudio observacional de centro único. Rev Ecuat Pediatr [Internet]. 2022;23(3):192-200. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.52011/161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52011/161
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Copyright: © Los autores. Publicado por Gaceta Médica JBG.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





